Redistribution and indirect effects of transport policy and projects in Jules Dupuit's thought
POINSOT
Type de document
ARTICLE A COMITE DE LECTURE REPERTORIE DANS BDI (ACL)
Langue
anglais
Auteur
POINSOT
Résumé / Abstract
The emergence of railroads in France in the nineteenth century gave rise to new debates on analytical issues. The focus of interest lay in the fact that they are natural monopolies. In this paper, I focus on Jules Dupuit's work on the operations of the railroad sector. Curiously, he seemed to have defended two contrasting positions, opening the way for debate among commentators: on the one hand, he claimed that unlimited competition is the most efficient way to operate in the railroad sector; on the other, he stated that State management was the best way to run the railroads. I aim to restore the consistency of Dupuit's positions on the railroads. In section II, I discuss Dupuit's position on unlimited competition in the railroad sector, showing that, for him, this kind of competition is not possible in the railroads and that it is not necessarily good for the welfare of society. Therefore, the State should regulate the railroad sector either by State management or through concessions. In section III, I specify the conditions under which Dupuit believed the State should manage the railroad sector instead of offering concessions to private companies
Source
Transport Policy, 36 p p.
Editeur
Elsevier